Liv Ames for EdSource

Liv Ames for EdSource

A review of California commune plans for improving school climate shows that few districts accept identified specific goals to ameliorate omnipresence and reduce suspensions and expulsions of foster students.

Public Counsel, a public interest law firm based in Los Angeles, reviewed the Local Control and Accountability Plans of the 64 districts in the state with at least 150 foster students. The plans are supposed to depict goals and actions the district volition take to meliorate in 8 priority areas, including school climate, with specific goals and actions for 3 subgroups of students – low-income students, English language learners and foster youth.

The 64 districts include 55 percent of the state's foster students, said Laura Faer, a co-author of the report, Fostering Education Success, released Wednesday.

Foster youth are now included as a subgroup under state police because of the difficulties they face and their overall depression academic performance. Foster youth – taken from their families because of abuse or neglect – often are placed in multiple homes and schools during their time in foster care. Most of them lack a consistent adult to ensure their needs are met. In California, foster youth are less probable to graduate from high school than depression-income students, English language learners and students with disabilities. They likewise have the highest dropout rate. For these reasons, the study's authors say, districts need to develop specific goals to meet foster students' needs.

Public Counsel

Public Counsel establish that few districts had specific attendance goals for foster students.

Most districts, yet, accept not however met that claiming, co-ordinate to the review of their LCAPs by Public Counsel. Amid other findings:

  • Merely 5 per centum of districts provided suspension goals that were specific for foster youth. Twenty-v percent included foster youth with their goals for other students.
  • Simply Temecula Valley Unified had a stand-lonely goal specifically addressing its foster youth expulsion rate. Fourteen per centum of districts included foster youth with their goals for other students.
  • Two school districts – Temecula Valley Unified and Hacienda La Puente – listed deportment to reduce suspensions and expulsions that specifically targeted foster youth. Seventeen pct of districts included foster youth with their overall goals for other students.
  • Only Temecula Valley Unified allocated funding to reduce foster youth suspensions and expulsions.

With i exception, districts too did non provide baseline information from which to determine whether they were making progress in reducing suspensions and expulsions of foster youth. Los Angeles Unified was the simply district that provided the information and only for suspensions. However, when districts were developing their plans in leap 2014, they had not received information from the country about who their foster youth were.

While these data are "discouraging, we recognize that districts were hampered in their ability to effectively place the needs of foster youth," said the written report's co-authors, Faer and Marjorie Cohen.

However, as of fall 2014, the California Section of Education provides districts with a list of their foster students and then they will be able to come across the requirements of the new state schoolhouse funding law, which recognizes foster students as a split up subgroup and provides supplemental funding for them. Faer said she is optimistic that now that districts know who their foster students are, they volition exist more specific when they update their plans this leap.

"The legal change that created the foster youth subgroup should be making a divergence in the lives of foster youth," Faer said. "So this year, we need schoolhouse districts to arrive real for them."

The report recommends that districts "invest in well-trained staff who can be a single, continuous bespeak of contact for foster youth and who tin can navigate across and coordinate with multiple systems," such equally the courts and the California Department of Social Services. The written report also suggests that districts implement positive disciplinary approaches in their schools every bit alternatives to suspensions, giving priority to schools that have the most foster students.

"The legal change that created the foster youth subgroup should be making a difference in the lives of foster youth," Faer said. "So this year, we need school districts to make it real for them."

The written report points to Temecula Valley Unified as an example considering of its commitment to provide counseling and a specific person to back up foster youth. The district is clear about its goals and the funds information technology plans to allocate for foster students, the report states. The district'due south plan also calls for implementing positive disciplinary practices, establishing a safe identify for foster youth to store personal items during transition and creating a resource heart to welcome foster youth to schoolhouse.

"We are looking at how to stay connected and create relationships," said Debra Jilek, executive assistant to the superintendent at Temecula Valley Unified. "We're investing in that."

To get more than reports similar this ane, click here to sign up for EdSource's no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.